How Does the Holy Spirit Dwell in Us?

HOW DOES THE HOLY SPIRIT DWELL IN US?

by Wayne S. Walker

          There is so much false doctrine about the Holy Spirit that constant attention to basic Biblical truth on the subject is both good and necessary. “By this we know that we abide in Him, and He in us, because He has given us of His Spirit” (1 John 4:13). Obviously, there is some sense in which the Holy Spirit affects the lives of God’s people today. Since, as the Scriptures clearly teach, references to the miraculous manifestations of the Spirit’s power are limited to the first century, references to the Spirit’s influence today must be understood in a different sense. So the question for this article is, “How Does the Spirit Dwell in Us?”

The Bible teaches that Deity can dwell in man. God the Father dwells in us (I John 4:12). Christ the Son dwells in us (Ephesians 3:17).  And the Holy Spirit dwells in us (2 Timothy 1:14). Since the Father, Son, and Spirit are one in their Deity, whatever is true of the indwelling of the Father and the Son must also be true of the Spirit’s indwelling.  While some take the extreme position that there is no indwelling of the Spirit in the Christian, the Bible teaches that there is such a thing. The major disagreements center on the manner of this indwelling.

The Calvinists teach that the Spirit directly comes into the heart of the elect to produce faith and remove Adamic sin. Holiness people claim a special manifestation of the Spirit or a second work of grace essential to “entire sanctification.” Pentecostals and Charismatics believe that the Spirit dwells miraculously in the Christian today and still performs miracles through them. Some brethren postulate a literal and personal, though not necessarily miraculous, indwelling of the Spirit directly in the Christian’s body, separate and apart from the word. Others say that the New Testament teaches no such concept but that the indwelling of the Spirit is through and by means of the word.

So what does the Bible say about the indwelling of the Spirit and how it is accomplished? First, we must understand the Spirit’s omnipresence (Psalm 139:7-10). God the Father is a person. He is omnipresent, but His person is said to be in heaven even though His presence is everywhere.  The Holy Spirit is also a person. Therefore, to say that the Spirit dwells in us no more means that His actual person is in us any more than to say that God dwells in us means that His actual person is in us. When we say that God dwells in us we are talking about being in a right relationship with Him (I John 4:15). Why cannot we understand the same thing with regard to the Spirit?

This now raises the question as to how this indwelling takes place.  Paul asked, “This only I want to learn from you: Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?” (Galatians 3:2). This implies that the means by which we receive the influence of the Spirit in our lives is by the hearing of faith. Ephesians 5:18-19 says that we are to be filled with the Spirit, the result of which is singing praise to God. But Colossians 3:16 says that we are to have the word of Christ dwelling in us, the result of which is singing praise to God. The logical conclusion is that we are filled with the Spirit by means of the word of Christ dwelling in us. We need to remember that the sword or instrument of the Spirit for His work is the word of God (Ephesians 6:17).

All questions about the Spirit’s indwelling cannot be answered in one short article. But there are just too many objections to the idea of a literal, personal, direct indwelling of the Spirit in the Christian to accept it as truth. When we speak of God’s dwelling in us, we are referring figuratively to the influence of God being seen in our lives.  The Holy Spirit dwells in us (I Corinthians 6:19-20). Does this not simply mean that through the influence of His word, He directs our lives to bear His fruit (Galatians 5:22-23)?

— In Search For Truth, January 1997; via The Gospel Observer, January 19, 1997

Advertisements

“Appoint Elders in Every Church”

 “APPOINT ELDERS IN EVERY CHURCH

By Wayne S. Walker

     In Titus 1:1-5, where “Paul, a servant of God and an apostle of Jesus Christ” wrote “To Titus, my true son in our common faith,” and told him, “For this reason I left you in Crete, that you should set in order the things that are lacking, and appoint elders in every city as I commanded you.”  Since other passages teach that God wants elders in every church, this necessarily implies that Titus was to appoint elders in every city where there was a church, or in every church in every city.  This practice has been followed for many years in faithful churches of Christ where qualified men were to be found.

However, in contrast to this simple teaching of the New Testament, a man named Charles Holt (formerly a gospel preacher, now deceased) and those who follow after him have ridiculed the idea of appointing elders.  In Sentinel of Truth (Vol. 3, No. 4), Holt wrote, “There is no ordaining or appointing of men (or women) TO BE—thus to become—‘elders’ and there is no ‘position’ called for by this term to which one can be elevated” (p. 1; emphasis mine, WSW).  This was written many years ago, in the mid to late 1960s.  Did Holt ever change his mind?  Much later, in The Examiner (Vol. 1, No. 2; Mar., 1986), he wrote, “You do not, can not, make someone an ‘elder’ by ordaination [sic] or appointment….Nor can we appoint or ordain a man to be an elder” (p.  11).  Let us now “examine” what the New Testament has to say about the appointment of elders.

  1. It should seem to be obvious enough that one should not need to say so, but the use of the word “appoint” itself indicates that elders were appointed, i.e., men were appointed as elders. The word in Titus 1:5, katasteses, from kathistemi, is defined in Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament to mean, “to set, place, put…to appoint one to administer an office.”  A similar word, cheirotonesantes from cheirotoneo, is found in Acts 14:23.   “So when they had appointed elders in every church, and prayed with fasting, they commended them to the Lord in whom they had believed.”  This term is defined in Thayer’s as “to elect, appoint, create.”  Thus, both passages teach that men were appointed as elders.  For Holt’s assertions to be proven true, he would have to find a passage which reads that men who were already elders (older men) were appointed to do some other specific thing.  The Bible just does not say this.  We must necessarily infer, then, that being an elder is something to which one is appointed, not merely something that just happens or that one simply assumes.
  2. The use of the word “elder” in the New Testament shows that they were to be appointed. It is true that sometimes the term is used in a generic sense of an older man.  But it can also be used in a context where it has an additional meaning.  Again, we turn to Thayer’s which defines the word, “a term of rank or office; as such borne by…among Christians, those who presided over the assemblies (or churches): Acts ix.30.”  This specific concept comes from the Jews and dates back to the seventy elders of Numbers 11:25.  These were not just any and all older men among the Israelites, but a specific group of men who had particular qualifications and were thus chosen as leaders among the tribes to do a certain work.  Similarly in James 5:14 we have “the elders of the church,” that is a specific group of men who could be identified separately from others and who held a special relationship to the congregation.

3. The work that is given to the elders in the Scriptures demonstrates that they must be appointed.  In Acts 20:17-28 we read that Paul “sent to Ephesus and called for the elders of the church.  He told them, “Therefore take heed to yourselves and to all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God which He purchased with His own blood.”  The word translated “overseers” or “bishops” means, according to Thayer’s, “a man charged with the duty of seeing that things to be done by others are done rightly, any curator, guardian, or superintendent…the superintendent, head, or overseer of any Christian church.  Those appointed as elders were to do the work of overseeing.  This kind of work involves some degree of authority.  Christ has all authority (Matthew 28:18).  Thus, no one can take such a work upon himself—he must be appointed to it.  Elders do not just assume or automatically grow into the work of being an overseer but are made overseers by the Holy Spirit through the process of their meeting the qualifications given by the Spirit (1 Timothy 3:1-7, Titus 1:6-9) and then being chosen and appointed by the congregation.

In conclusion, the New Testament speaks of “appointing elders.”  That should be sufficient for those who wish to speak where the Bible speaks.  However, no method of accomplishing this is specified.  The passages studied in this article, along with Acts 6:1-6 as an example of a congregation choosing and appointing those to serve among them, suggest four basic steps.  The first is finding men who meet the qualifications.  The second is preparing the congregation by scriptural instruction on the subject to determine if there are any men who meet the qualifications.  The third is selecting those men who are qualified from among the number, done by the entire membership.  And the fourth is appointing or ordaining such men to the office by someone selected for this purpose, perhaps a gospel preacher.  Please notice that the preacher himself does not do the selecting.  That is done by the congregation.   The preacher would merely appoint or ordain them, that is, set apart the men chosen by the multitude in some public way to be recognized for their work.

Thus it is clear from the Scriptures that not only are elders made so by God based on their age, knowledge, and experience by meeting the qualifications revealed by the Spirit, but also they are selected and appointed in the congregation by the action of men based upon those qualifications found in God’s word.  Therefore, we conclude that this appointing involves decisions made by the local church.  The fact that churches of Christ have appointed me as elders for years does not necessarily make the practice scriptural.  But it is fair to say that faithful congregations of God’s people have followed the instruction to “appoint elders” because it is taught in the Scriptures.  We should not abandon a scriptural concept just because Holt and his Examiner bunch question it.  “That we should no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, in the cunning craftiness by which they lie in wait to deceive” (Ephesians 4:15)

—taken from With All Boldness; July, 1991; Vol. 2, No. 2; pp. 19-20

Law and Grace

LAW AND GRACE

By Wayne S. Walker

     There has been quite a bit of loose talk, both in days gone by and in more recent years, concerning law and grace.  Some confidently affirm that keeping God’s law has absolutely nothing whatever to do with being saved—we are under grace, not law, they say—and then turn too passages like John 1:17 to substantiate their claim.  Others, in reaction to this, may leave the impression that men are saved only through law-keeping, thus adding more fuel to the fire.  This would occur, no doubt, unintentionally.  But if such be true, then we may need to be more careful about what we emphasize in our preaching.  That the Christian is under law, at least in some sense of the word, should be incontrovertible.  Such passages as 1 Corinthians 9:21, Galatians 6:1, and James 1:25, etc., plainly demonstrate this fact.  The question is, to what extent does keeping Christ’s law play a part in our salvation?

First, we need to understand the nature and purpose of law in general.  Law is somewhat like a boundary, out of which those bound by the law must not go.  We all understand this in relation to civil law (Romans 13:1-7).  The most obvious aspect of law is the punishment of those who decide to break it rather than keep it (1 Timothy 1:8-10).  But this aspect is really based upon a more fundamental fact, which is that law is a communication from a person or persons in authority to those in subjection concerning what the latter must do to be acceptable.  This is the positive side of law; it provides guidelines so that those who want to do well may know how to live properly.  God’s law is no different.

So, are we saved merely by law-keeping?  I know of no gospel preacher or any other faithful Christian who does now believe, or has ever believed, or hopefully ever will believe, that salvation comes solely by observing rules and regulations.  That is why the Old Testament law was repealed.  Of course, that is how God designed it to be in the first place—to show men that they cannot be justified simply by law.  If such were true, there would have been no need for Jesus’s sacrifice.  Those who are unlearned and too lazy to study God’s word for themselves may have misunderstood what others have said concerning this matter and reached a wrong conclusion about what we teach.  But this is not the real issue.  Everyone agrees that we are saved by grace (Ephesians 2:8-9).  Yet, we are saved by grace through faith; and faith, to be of a saving nature, must include complete and trusting obedience to God’s law (James 2:14).  In fact, it is by submitting to God’s law that men enter into and remain within the sphere of His grace.

No one keeps the whole law perfectly.  Again, if we did, Christ need not have died.  All have sinned (Romans 3:23), and sin is a transgression of the law (1 John 3:4).  Remember, if there were no law, there could be no transgression, and, hence, no sin (Romans 4:15).  This is where grace comes in.  God has devised, in His grace, a plan to make up for our imperfections by forgiving them (Ephesians 1:7, Hebrews 8:12).  But receiving that grace and forgiveness is conditioned upon keeping certain laws ordained by God—i.e., obedience to His will regarding the gospel terms of pardon (Hebrews 5:8-9, 1 Peter 1:22, 1 John 2:3).  Therefore, we may say that we are saved by grace, understanding that we depend solely upon God’s grace for a plan of redemption, and not our own human good works; and that we are saved by faith, in that salvation is based not on a system of perfect rule-keeping, but on a trusting, obedient faith.  Likewise, in a very limited sense, we are saved by keeping God’s law, meaning by meeting the conditions of faith set forth in His law.  But none of these things saves exclusive of the others.

—taken from Vanguard; Mar. 23, 1978; Vol. 4, No. 6; p. 10

The Latest Arguments for Instrumental Worship in Light of the Scripture

THE LATEST ARGUMENTS FOR INSTRUMENTAL

MUSIC IN LIGHT OF THE SCRIPTURE

By Wayne S. Walker

     Back in 1990, I had the opportunity to attend the first night of a debate on the subject of instrumental music in worship that was conducted at Georgetown, Ohio.  Dennis Lewis of the Georgetown Church of Christ, an independent Christian Church, affirmed that the use of mechanical instruments of music in the worship of God is scriptural.  Paul Vaughan, of the Brown County church of Christ, denied the proposition.  The purpose of this article is not to review the entire debate (I was not able to return to hear all the speeches).  However, I would like to review some of the newer arguments made during the debate in favor of instrumental music in worship.

After several years of separation between the independent Christian Churches and New Testament church of Christ, there has been a push in recent years, primarily from leaders in the Christian Church, to lump instrumental music in with other matters of personal opinion or individual conscience and thus establish some grounds for “unity” between the two groups.  Unfortunately, some of the more “liberal-thinking” lights among us have accepted these overtures and appear willing to compromise on the issue for the sake of peace.  In the debate which I attended and in the paper One Body, several arguments of recent vintage have been made to justify this compromise, and they need to be examined in light of the Scriptures.

We are now being told that the New Testament teaches that all things which are not explicitly forbidden by the doctrine of Christ may be done by men living today without their being guilt of sin in so doing.  This is just a reworking of the old “the Bible doesn’t say not to” argument and shows a lack of understanding about the nature of authority.  It is not necessary for God explicitly to forbid everything that He does not want.  Hebrews 7:11-14 shows that whatever God does not authorize, either generically or specifically, is sinful.  He reveals what He wants us to do, and we must simply leave it at that.  To do otherwise makes human wisdom rather than God’s word our authority.

It is also being affirmed that instrumental music is all right because of the nature of worship.  Some would say that there is no specific form nor content for worship commanded in the New Testament.  Then they redefine worship to include whatever comes from man’s sincere desire to serve God, so long as it is not explicitly forbidden.  Thus, if a person’s desire to serve God expresses itself by using instrumental music in worship, that is acceptable.  But this just is not true.  When men praise God with music, whatever the circumstances, God has specified the form—singing, and the content—psalms, hymns, and spiritual song (Ephesians 5:19, Colossians 3:16).  There is a vast difference between what God has authorized as worship and what fallible human beings may want to do in their misguided attempts to serve Him.

Another argument being used to justify instrumental music in worship is that we are now under a covenant of grace, not a covenant of law.  It almost sounds as if the argument is that we can do things not authorized by God’s law, and His grace will take care of it.  Of course, denominational folks have been making this same argument against the necessity of baptism for years.  But, again, it is not so.  Grace and law are not mutually exclusive.  Of course, we are justified by grace, not by law, but this has always been the case.  When we sin against God’s law, we can receive forgiveness through His grace as we repent.  Yet, He still expects us to keep His “perfect law of liberty” (James 1:25) because that is the boundary within which His grace is found.  To go beyond it is to remove ourselves from the benefits of His grace.

Surely, no Christian should be a harping hobby-rider on any one subject—be it instrumental music, baptism, institutionalism, divorce, etc.—to the exclusion of other important topics.  We must preach the whole counsel of God.  But those who do not understand the mistakes of the past are doomed to repeat them.  Through the years we have been faced with many arguments for instrumental music in worship—“psallo” includes the instrument, instruments are only aids to singing, the Old Testament authorizes instruments, there will be instruments in heaven, etc.  We need to be aware of these as well as the more recent arguments and how to answer them from the Scriptures so that we can teach our children, ground those who are babes in Christ, keep those who are weak from falling into this error, maintain the purity of New Testament worship, and generally meet Satan head on as he seeks to conquer us on this issue.

My own family background was in the Christian Church.  My grandparents and then my parents left the Christian Church many years ago, and they taught me well why.  Like Abraham’s attitude towards that country from which he had come out, I do not seek an opportunity to return to religious error, because I desire something better—the simple truth of God’s word.  It is my fervent hope and prayer that we all shall continue to search the Scriptures daily and stand for the truth.  “Whoever transgresses and does not abide in the doctrine of Christ does not have God.  He who abides in the doctrine of Christ has both the Father and the Son (2 John v. 9).

—taken from With All Boldness; July, 1990; Vol. 1, No. 2; p. 26

Zeal for the Lord

ZEAL FOR THE LORD

By Wayne S. Walker

     In 2 Kings 10:16, Jehu, who had been anointed king of the nation of Israel and commissioned to destroy the seed of wicked Ahab, said to Jehonadab the Rechabite, “Come with me and see my zeal for the Lord.”  From the account of Jehu’s activity in chapters 9 and 10, no one can deny that he did have a zeal for the Lord of some kind.   In this short article, I would like to encourage all Christians who are reading these words to develop a zeal and dedication for Christ also.

I am not much of a sports fan.  I especially do not care for professional sports because of the crass commercialism involved.  However, in years gone by, I used to enjoy watching the Olympic games.  The next time they occur, if you have some extra time in which you are not sharing the gospel and trying to win souls, I would suggest that you also take a look at the Olympic competition.  There are several reasons why the Olympics appealed to me, the first being that the participants were not there for the money—there was simply no money to be had in former days.  Rather, they were there just because they wanted to be.

Also many interesting things can happen during the games.  In the 1976 Winter Olympics at Innsbruck, Austria, the men’s downhill ski race, the first main event, was won in a spectacular performance by an Austrian name Franz Klammer.  The amazing thing about Klammer was that he was only 22 years old then (the same age as this writer was at the time).  There were many men much older and more experienced  than he, but Klammer was faster than any of them, and his flawless run beat them all.  Just think—what were you doing at age 22?  What feats for Christ were you trying to accomplish then?  Of course, there are things in life more important than winning a men’s downhill ski race, but Franz Klammer will have something which he can remember and be proud of for the rest of his life.  Yet many Christians, two and three times as old as he, have done practically nothing so far in the service of the Master!

But the major reason that I have enjoyed the Olympics is that they bring to my mind the tremendous amount of time, energy, effort, and plain old hard work that these athletes must put in to get where they are.  And when I think of that, I begin to feel ashamed for my brethren, and myself, because we do not seem to exhibit this same kind of enthusiasm and dedication for our Savior.  “…Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible” (1 Corinthians 9:25b).

As we contemplate the work that needs to be done—seeking the lost, restoring the fallen, strengthening the weak, teaching the young in faith, keeping the saved saved, ministering to the sick, providing for the needy, encouraging the lonely and discouraged, comforting the bereaved, and visiting the fatherless and widows in their affliction—let us remember the words of the inspired Preacher who wrote, “Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might” (Ecclesiastes 9:10).  Truly, the Lord’s people must possess a “zeal for the Lord.”

—in The Gospel Guardian; May 15, 1976; Vol. 28, No. 10; p. 12

The Dews of Sorrow

THE DEWS OF SORROW

By Wayne S. Walker

“Strengthening the souls of the disciples, exhorting them to continue in the faith, and saying, ‘We must through many tribulations enter the kingdom of God’” (Acts 14:22).  For many years, the theme of ABC’s Wide World of Sports was “the thrill of victory and the agony of defeat.”  I was actually watching the Olympics in the year when that poor skier, who was shown over and over again to illustrate “the agony of defeat,” missed his last turn, crashed into the fence, and fell in the snow.  Ouch!  That must have hurt!

Life is like that.  Each of us can undoubtedly look back over his or her life and remember “the thrill of victory”—graduation from school, first car, landing a good job, marriage, the birth of children, etc.  However, all of us have had our share of “the agony of defeat” as well—the deaths of loved ones, financial difficulties, family problems, serious illness, rejection by friends, perhaps even mistreatment by fellow church members, and other such tragedies and heartaches.

In her hymn “The Sands of Time” (#234 in HFWR, though this wonderful stanza is not in that book), Scottish poetess Annie Ross Cousin wrote:

“With mercy and with judgment My web of time He wove,

And aye the dews of sorrow Were brightened by His love.

I’ll bless the hand that guided, I’ll bless the heart that planned,

When throned where glory dwelleth In Immanuel’s land.”

Our lives are like a web woven with “bane and blessing, pain and pleasure.”  There will be trials and tribulations.  Some people react by continuing to grieve over them, harboring grudges, and letting their hurts fester until they become bitter.  It is easy to do.  That is why we are warned, “Looking carefully lest anyone fall short of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up cause trouble, and by this many become defiled” (Hebrews 12:15).

Others react to “the dews of sorrow” by turning to God and allowing them to be “brightened by His love.”  They cast their burdens on the Lord (Psalm 55:22).  Then forgetting those things which are behind and reaching forward to those things which are ahead “in Immanuel’s land,” they just continue pressing on toward the goal (Philippians 3:13-14).  So, whenever you experience “the agony of defeat,” don’t let it keep you down.  Rather, get back up and keep on keeping on, always remembering that “the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us” (Romans 8:18).

Can You Be an Undenominational Christian?

CAN YOU BE AN UNDENOMINATIONAL CHRISTIAN?

By Wayne S. Walker

     What denomination were Peter, Paul, Philip, and Barnabas members of?  I dare say that practically everyone would agree that they were not members of any denomination, for there were no denominations in the first century.  Is it possible today for a person to be as they were?  I am not speaking of being in an ecclesiastical organization which simply claims to be “non-denominational.”  I am talking about actually being an undenominational Christian.

Our aim is to proclaim undenominational Christianity and plead for a return to God’s ways.  The basis for salvation in New Testament times was the response of human beings to the preaching of the good news of Jesus Christ (Mark 16:15-16).  He, possessing all the attributes of Deity, gave up the glory of heaven and came to this earth as a humble Savior (Philippians 2:5-8).  As a result of His death, burial, and resurrection, salvation was offered as a free gift to all who would submit to Him by faith (1 Corinthians 15:1-4).

Those who were thus saved by their trust and obedience were added by the Lord to His church (Acts 2:36-41, 47).  They were Christians—and Christians only (Acts 11:26, 26:28; 1 Pet. 4:16).  Our message is that people can be saved in the same way and can still be just Christians today.   The Bible presents all the saved as one spiritual body in Christ (Ephesians 1:22-23, 4:4, 5:23).  Can you be in this body or church without affiliation to a denomination?  God’s word teaches that you can, and this is what we want to announce.

How is all this accomplished?  “The seed is the word of God” (Luke 8:11).  The same gospel of Christ is God’s power unto salvation (Romans 1:16).  It can be preached today as it was in the first century, and folks can obey from the heart that same form of doctrine as they did in New Testament days (Romans 6:17-18; cf. vs. 3-4).  When this happens, then the same results will be forthcoming—just like planting the same kind of seed year after year.  If you are interested in this, we would like to study further with you.  Won’t you give it some thought?